Oh, poor Reese Witherspoon
Poor thing. She was told the dress she wore to the Globes was a "vintage" Chanel. Well, not only was it not "one of a kind" but Kirsten Dunst wore it to the Globes three years ago! Sure, it may not de a big deal to those who lead normal, everyday lives like ours.
However, here's my sad story:
Senior Prom. Happy as a clam. Won Runner-up for prom queen. While waiting in line for pictures to get taken for the prom queen court, our senior history teacher (she's like, old) walks in wearing the exact same dress I had on. Embarassing? Oh hell yeah! Not a student mind you, but a freaking teacher! So, yes, I symphathize with Reese. But Reese, at least it was Kirsten Dunst and not Rue McClanahan.

Source
However, here's my sad story:
Senior Prom. Happy as a clam. Won Runner-up for prom queen. While waiting in line for pictures to get taken for the prom queen court, our senior history teacher (she's like, old) walks in wearing the exact same dress I had on. Embarassing? Oh hell yeah! Not a student mind you, but a freaking teacher! So, yes, I symphathize with Reese. But Reese, at least it was Kirsten Dunst and not Rue McClanahan.
Dunst wore the same designer vintage gown at the Globes in 2003, prompting top stylists to criticise Witherspoon for not doing her homework before stepping out at the awards show.The LEGALLY BLONDE star's publicist NANCI RYDER says, "Although it was disappointing that the dress had already been worn, Reese looked beautiful and the bigger deal is Reese won the Golden Globe for her work in Walk The Line." Source

Source



































Comments on "Oh, poor Reese Witherspoon"
-
Per said ... (7:42 AM) :
post a commentSissy little girl.